🔗 Share this article Relatives' Anguish Over Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family. A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations. A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward. “At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Troubled by the Past A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground. “It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.” “I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved. “It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.” She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.” Searching for Answers and Clarity The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious. Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching. “The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.” It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.” “There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.” The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.